![]() Quite work thus, in December, Matthew Garrett committed a It turns out, though, that this approach didn't The kernel developers, reasonably, concluded that, if theīIOS says that ASPM is not supported, they should not mess with theĪssociated registers. Information passed to the kernel by the BIOS is whether ASPM is supported The kernel about the functionality that is present. Is charged with the initial configuration of the system and with telling It is a bit more complicated than that, though on x86 systems, the BIOS Mechanisms, ASPM can be turned on or off. In some situations (usually those involving batteries) this tradeoff may beĪcceptable in others it is not. ![]() ![]() Sometimes take noticeably longer if those devices have been powered down. So, on systems where ASPM is in use, access to devices can ASPM can save power, but the usual tradeoff applies: aĭevice which is in a reduced power state will not be immediately availableįor use. Peripherals into a lower power state when it seems that there may be little "Active state power management" (ASPM) was developed as a means for putting those PCI-Express devices can take a lot of power even when they are idle. But a true fixĪs a result of the high clock rates used, Workaround which will make things better for some users. To have located the change that caused the problem and has provided a Launchpad thread, but little in the way of solutions. This problem has generated a fair amount of discussion, "major" power management regression which significantly reduced battery life With some fanfare that the 2.6.38 kernel - and those following - had a
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |